Posts Tagged ‘Rustock’

View All Spam

Rustock down?

By Phil Hay  •  March 16th, 2011  •   Spam

A story emerged today on KrebsonSecurity about the Rustock botnet being disabled, and spam volumes from this rogue spammer plummeting.

A brief look at at our spam traps today confirmed that output from Rustock did indeed dry up today. The chart below shows an index of daily spam volume changes from Rustock over the last few weeks:

 

Today, Rustock spam completely stopped (16 March, 3pm GMT).  We can also confirm that the Rustock control servers that we know about are not responding.  It is unclear yet who or what caused the shutdown.  Its also possible it has been abandoned. Over the past three years, Rustock has been responsible for a huge amount of spam, at times representing half of all spam caught in our spam traps. But since September last year, when Spamit.com was shut down, its output diminished significantly, and its spam templates hardly changed.

Whatever the reason, lets hope this one sticks. Previous attempts at botnet shutdowns have tended to be short lived as the botnet herders simply regroup and start again.  Its too early to say bye bye Rustock, but the thought is certainly nice.

Update: According to a Wall Street Journal report here it looks like Microsoft, in conjunction with US Federal authorities, was responsible for the takedown of Rustock.

Tags:    |    |    |  

View All Spam

Spam Volumes Drop After Spamit Shakeup

By Phil Hay  •  October 14th, 2010  •   Spam

The last few weeks has seen quite a shakeup in the spamming world.  Our Spam Volume Index, which records relative movements in spam volume sent to a bundle of domains we monitor, has recorded a substantial drop two weeks in a row.

M86 Security Spam Volume Index

A major cause of the drop was a sudden drop in spam output from Rustock, one of the major spamming botnets of recent times.  We noticed the decline starting around 20 September and dropping to negligible levels by 23 September.  This happened at the same time as initial reports surfaced that the notorious SpamIt.com operation was shutting down.

Rustock Spam Volume Decline

Spamit.com is underground group of email spam affiliates closely linked to GlavMed, which in turn is responsible for one of the largest and oldest affiliate programs called “Canadian Pharmacy”. In recent times Canadian Pharmacy has been the dominant spammed program, simultaneously spammed by most of the major spamming botnets.  In late September, the SpamIt.com domain had the following message announcing its impending shutdown on 10 October.

SpamIt.com web page prior to 10 October

Today, the SpamIt.com domain has the following page, which translated, reads “10.10.10 The King is dead! Long live the king!”

SpamIt.com: "The King is Dead. Long Live the King!"

Rustock, in particular, has had a long history of association with the Canadian Pharmacy program. In fact, for much of its life that we have observed, its spam output has been mostly or solely Canadian Pharmacy spam.  The Rustock botnet itself has not gone away. Its control servers are still up, we have observed Rustock spamming in our lab, and some of our customers are still experiencing a low level of Rustock spam hitting their servers.

So what of the other botnets? There has been some suggestion that we may have confused Rustock spam with Pushdo.  Not so. We observe these bots closely in our lab and know their traits, habits and templates well. The following chart shows Pushdo’s spam output over the same time frame.

Pushdo's ouput dips, gains and dips again

In the chart above we can see the big dip following the disruption to Pushdo’s control servers in late August.  But inevitably Pushdo’s output recovered as it added new control servers.  We observed another big dip on 3rd October, in line with other observers.  At this stage we are unsure whether this latest dip is related to the SpamIt.com closure. Researchers are taking a close interest in Pushdo and there may well be other factors impacting on it (for instance see here).

Even more recently, since the weekend, the Grum botnet, another major spammer has also gone very quiet. Here is a chart from the same period, that shows a marked drop in spam output after 8 October, very close to the 10 October “official” SpamIt.com closure.

Grum's output dips after 8 October

So, what to make of all this?  It seems that the SpamIt.com closure has had a major impact on the volume of spam output, as some botnet operators/spammers have lost one of their major affiliate programs, or in other words, sources of cash. How long it will last is another question entirely. There are competing affiliate programs for botnet operators to sign up for.  We have  noticed that one of the smaller botnets, Xarvester, who we have previously linked to Spamit.com has already swapped from Canadian Pharmacy to Ultimate Replicas.  And it may well be that SpamIt.com and Canadian Pharmacy have gone into hiding, and after a brief hiatus, will reemerge in another guise.  Only time will tell.  In the meantime we are not complaining.

Tags:    |    |    |    |    |  

View All Botnets

Revisiting the King of Spam

By Rodel Mendrez  •  July 29th, 2010  •   Botnets

We keep a close eye on spam and the malware that drives spam production. Our recent report highlighted some of the worst offenders, and Rustock is without a doubt the leader of the pack. Over the last six months, the proportion of Rustock spam in our spam traps peaked to nearly 60% and it has never returned to levels lower than 20% of total spam.

Who’s the Rustock spambot that we know?

Over time, we have observed regular updates to Rustock. There is no consistent name given to it by anti-virus vendors, but recent Rustock binaries are detected by some anti-virus engines as Bubnix. The newest Rustock variant was first detected last December 2009. A month after that we observed a large influx of Rustock spam that spiked to over 50% of the spam we observed over the next few months. Though the malware may have different detection names and OS installation behavior, it employs a similar rootkit-based spamming engine, similar command and control architecture, and similar observable patterns in spam traffic.

Read More

Tags:    |    |