<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for M86 Security Labs Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labs.m86security.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labs.m86security.com</link>
	<description>M86 Security Labs blog for all news related to security.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Hijacks with AJAX by På den säkra sidan &#8211; Utgåva 04 &#124; SAFESIDE-bloggen</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2012/01/web-hijacks-with-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>På den säkra sidan &#8211; Utgåva 04 &#124; SAFESIDE-bloggen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=4257#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>[...] Teknik tungt: Ladda skadlig javascript genom AJAX (CS) http://labs.m86security.com/2012/01/web-hijacks-with-ajax/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Teknik tungt: Ladda skadlig javascript genom AJAX (CS) <a href="http://labs.m86security.com/2012/01/web-hijacks-with-ajax/" rel="nofollow">http://labs.m86security.com/2012/01/web-hijacks-with-ajax/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Scam Spreading: &#8216;Hey, I just made a photoshop of you, check it out&#8217; by Facebook Photoshop Scam Spreading Like Wildfire &#124; National Cyber Security</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/04/facebook-scam-spreading-hey-i-just-made-a-photoshop-of-you-check-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Photoshop Scam Spreading Like Wildfire &#124; National Cyber Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3293#comment-737</guid>
		<description>[...] Clicking on Facebook links is dangerous business. At least a few of aren&#8217;t aware of this sad fact; otherwise, the latest scam Facebook app wouldn&#8217;t be spreading at the alarming rate of almost 90,000 clicks per hour. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clicking on Facebook links is dangerous business. At least a few of aren&#8217;t aware of this sad fact; otherwise, the latest scam Facebook app wouldn&#8217;t be spreading at the alarming rate of almost 90,000 clicks per hour. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Scam Alert: &#8216;Everyone do check what she did on cam&#8217; Spreading by Ways to mitigate risk with a corporate social media policy &#124; Business Tutorials, Courses and Articles</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/04/facebook-scam-alert-everyone-do-check-what-she-did-on-cam-spreading/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Ways to mitigate risk with a corporate social media policy &#124; Business Tutorials, Courses and Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3353#comment-736</guid>
		<description>[...] news &#111;&#102; late. M86 Security Inc. &#104;&#097;&#115; tracked a number &#111;&#102; Facebook scams using malicious photos, wall posts and third-party applications. M86 researchers &#115;&#097;&#121; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news &#111;&#102; late. M86 Security Inc. &#104;&#097;&#115; tracked a number &#111;&#102; Facebook scams using malicious photos, wall posts and third-party applications. M86 researchers &#115;&#097;&#121; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 0-day exploit used in a targeted attack &#8211; CVE-2011-1255 by Recently Patched IE Flaw Exploited as Zero-Day &#124; CISSP 2 CISSP</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/06/0-day-exploit-used-in-a-targeted-attack-cve-2011-1255/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Recently Patched IE Flaw Exploited as Zero-Day &#124; CISSP 2 CISSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3613#comment-729</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Based on data we have reviewed from various sources, we can say with a high level of certainty, that the anonymous researcher who according to Microsoft’s security advisory, reported the vulnerability details to VeriSign iDefense, or at least one of his acquaintances, had used the vulnerability details for malicious purposes, as part of targeted attacks,&#8221; malware experts from M86 Security say. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Based on data we have reviewed from various sources, we can say with a high level of certainty, that the anonymous researcher who according to Microsoft’s security advisory, reported the vulnerability details to VeriSign iDefense, or at least one of his acquaintances, had used the vulnerability details for malicious purposes, as part of targeted attacks,&#8221; malware experts from M86 Security say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phishing Scam in an HTML Attachment by Under the phishing filters&#8217; radar &#124; GESS IT</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/03/phishing-scam-in-an-html-attachment/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Under the phishing filters&#8217; radar &#124; GESS IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 08:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3112#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] issued by modern browsers such as Firefox and Chrome. On its blog, security firm M86Security reports that the trick involves attaching an HTML document instead of sending a link. It remains unclear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issued by modern browsers such as Firefox and Chrome. On its blog, security firm M86Security reports that the trick involves attaching an HTML document instead of sending a link. It remains unclear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Malicious Spam on the increase again by Commtouch: 71 percent increase in new zombies &#124; ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/04/malicious-spam-on-the-increase-again/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Commtouch: 71 percent increase in new zombies &#124; ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3385#comment-660</guid>
		<description>[...] M86 Security is also reporting an increase in malicious spam, attributing the growing trend to the ongoing spamvertised notifications and verification order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M86 Security is also reporting an increase in malicious spam, attributing the growing trend to the ongoing spamvertised notifications and verification order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rustock down? by Rustock Botnet Flatlined, Spam Volumes Plummet &#8212; Krebs on Security</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/03/rustock-down/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustock Botnet Flatlined, Spam Volumes Plummet &#8212; Krebs on Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3226#comment-503</guid>
		<description>[...] me a note privately.Update, March 17, 1:47 p.m., ET: Add the graphic from M86 Security labs, which said on its blog that it also has seen a Rustock spam dry up, and that the botnet&#8217;s controllers are not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me a note privately.Update, March 17, 1:47 p.m., ET: Add the graphic from M86 Security labs, which said on its blog that it also has seen a Rustock spam dry up, and that the botnet&#8217;s controllers are not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rustock down? by Rustock botnet&#039;s operations disrupted &#124; ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/03/rustock-down/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustock botnet&#039;s operations disrupted &#124; ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3226#comment-499</guid>
		<description>[...] to Symantec and M86 Security, an unknown team of researchers managed to successfully disrupt the spamming operations of one of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Symantec and M86 Security, an unknown team of researchers managed to successfully disrupt the spamming operations of one of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rustock down? by Rustock botnet mysteriously goes dark</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/03/rustock-down/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustock botnet mysteriously goes dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3226#comment-498</guid>
		<description>[...] the reason, lets hope this one sticks,&#8221; wrote M86&#8242;s Phil Hay. &#8220;Previous attempts at botnet shutdowns have tended to be short lived as the botnet herders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the reason, lets hope this one sticks,&#8221; wrote M86&#8242;s Phil Hay. &#8220;Previous attempts at botnet shutdowns have tended to be short lived as the botnet herders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can&#8217;t Believe A Girl Did This Because of Justin Bieber? You Shouldn&#8217;t by I can&#8217;t believe a GIRL did this because of Justin Bieber &#124; ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://labs.m86security.com/2011/02/cant-believe-a-girl-did-this-justin-bieber-you-shouldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>I can&#8217;t believe a GIRL did this because of Justin Bieber &#124; ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.m86security.com/?p=3013#comment-437</guid>
		<description>[...] M86 Security Labs has branded it a &#8220;likejacking&#8221; scam (a play on the term clickjacking, which means prompting a victim to click something while a different action is taken behind the scenes) and said it was similar to previous campaigns that were first observed last year. Clicking the link leads to FouTube page, a fake version of YouTube, that says &#8220;Please Watch this video only if you are 16 years or older.&#8221; The FouTube player video window is overlayed with a hidden iframe; clicking on it anywhere will submit a Facebook Like and spread the post on the victim&#8217;s Facebook page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M86 Security Labs has branded it a &#8220;likejacking&#8221; scam (a play on the term clickjacking, which means prompting a victim to click something while a different action is taken behind the scenes) and said it was similar to previous campaigns that were first observed last year. Clicking the link leads to FouTube page, a fake version of YouTube, that says &#8220;Please Watch this video only if you are 16 years or older.&#8221; The FouTube player video window is overlayed with a hidden iframe; clicking on it anywhere will submit a Facebook Like and spread the post on the victim&#8217;s Facebook page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

