Archive for the ‘Reports’ Category

View All BotnetsView All CybercrimeView All ReportsView All Social NetworkingView All SpamView All Vulnerabilities

M86 Security Threat Report for the Second Half of 2011 is Now Available

By Ziv Mador  •  February 8th, 2012  •   Botnets Cybercrime Reports Social Networking Spam Vulnerabilities

We are releasing today our bi-annual Threat Report for 2H 2011. The report relies on M86 Security Labs analysis of spam and malware activity, including the current use of exploit kits, fraudulent digital certificates and social networking schemes. Key points from the M86 Security Labs for the second half of 2011 are:
1. Targeted attacks became sophisticated and pursued a wider range of organizations, including commercial, national critical infrastructure and military targets.
2. Use of stolen or fraudulent digital certificates has become more common, especially as part of targeted attacks.
3. In several targeted attacks, malware was hidden by embedding itself in various file formats—with a few cases of multiple embedding layers. This method can evade security software that fails to scan deep enough.
4. Blackhole has become the most prevalent exploit kit in the second half of 2011 with a huge margin over other exploit kits. Some of the exploit kits which were active in the past are rarely used now or were practically abandoned.
5. Newer versions of Blackhole are being deployed first in Eastern Europe. Its authors increased its update frequency and added new exploits and tricks to evade detection, such as checking the software version on the client machine before attempting to exploit it.
6. Fake social media notifications are now a mainstream way for spammers to dupe users into clicking links.
7. Facebook continues to be a conduit for spam and malware, as many campaigns are spreading virally by enticing users to share posts that promise gift cards or other rewards.
8. Hacked, but otherwise legitimate, websites played a major role in distributing spam and malware by redirecting browsers to the ultimate destination.
9. Malicious Web content currently exploits more than 50 vulnerabilities in various software products. The most commonly exploited products are Microsoft Internet Explorer, Oracle Java, Adobe Acrobat Reader, Adobe Flash and Microsoft Office products.
10. The overall volume of spam continued to decline in 2011, reaching a four-year low in December 2011.
11. Eight spamming botnets were responsible for 90% of the spam monitored by M86 Security Labs. All of these botnets are familiar and have been established for some time.
12. The proportion of malicious spam rose in the second half of the year from less than 1% to 5%, including a massive spike in malicious attachments in August and September. Later in the year, the focus shifted from malicious attachments to malicious links that led to exploit kits, in particular, the Blackhole exploit kit.
13. Some noticeable wins by law enforcement authorities and researchers against cybercriminals, botnets and affiliate programs like fake AV and rogue online pharmacies, took place this year.
14. Malicious Web content hosted in China targets mostly older versions of Internet Explorer, which is popular in that country.
15. Almost half of the global malicious Web content is hosted in the U.S. The states hosting most malware are Florida, California, Texas and Washington.

The report provides statistics about the geographical distribution of web-based malware, about the most commonly used exploits and about the prevalence of exploit kits. Statistics about spam categories and spam botnets are also provided. In addition to these statistics, the report includes eleven featured articles about current cyber threats and ends with recommendations for administrators, Website owners and end users.
The M86 Security Labs Report can be downloaded from http://m86.it/2HSecReport.
We hope you find the information in this report useful.
M86 Security Labs

View All Reports

Statement About Infection of Macs by ZeuS

By Bradley Anstis  •  August 13th, 2010  •   Reports

In recent press coverage several industry publications and blogs stated that between 3,000 – 4,000 Mac OS machines had been infected with the latest ZeuS Trojan. We believe that this is an incorrect interpretation of Figure 3 from our recent M86 Security Labs report.

Figure 11, Admin Panel of Eleonore Exploit Kit
Figure 3: Stats from the Eleonore Exploit Kit Administrative Panel

Figure 3 does not show the number of infected computers. It is a screen shot of an exploit kit console that shows the number of times that the malicious page had been requested and identifies those visits by the type of operating system of the visitor’s computer. In this case, it shows that the exploit kit’s page was served to as many as 300,000 users of which 3,851 visits were from computers running Mac OS.

Tags:    |  

View All Reports

Customers of Global Financial Institution Hit by Cybercrime

By Bradley Anstis  •  August 10th, 2010  •   Reports

Today, we released a report of an attack targeting the UK customers of a global financial institution. This attack has been on-going since early July, and our research has discovered that approximately 3000 customers of this financial institution have fallen victim to it. We’ve estimated that close to £675,000 GBP (over $1 Million USD) has been stolen from customer accounts.

The M86 Security Labs team detected this illegal operation after discovering a malicious code attack used to infect users’ PCs with a Trojan. The team then followed the trail to a Command & Control center. The research reveals that the cybercriminals used a combination of exploit kits, the new Zeus v3 Trojan, and money mule accounts to compromise user systems, successfully avoid anti-fraud systems, and rob bank accounts. The whole operation shows a high degree of technical sophistication and complexity, and highlights the continuing and escalating battle we have with cybercrime.

Our report exposes the architecture, business model, tools and methods used by the cybercriminal operation behind this attack. You can download a copy of the report here.

The image below illustrates one of the cybercriminal’s admin panels,showing financial transactions from compromised accounts sent to money mule accounts.

Admin panel showing financial transactions from compromised accounts sent to Money Mule accounts

M86 Security representatives have informed relevant law enforcement agencies of all criminal activities and methods used by the perpetrators of this attack.

Tags:    |    |    |  

View All Reports

Web Exploits – There’s an App for That

By Phil Hay  •  April 29th, 2010  •   Reports

This week M86 Security Labs released a report that looks into growing problem – Web Exploit kits. These off-the-shelf kits are used by attackers to automatically exploit vulnerabilities when users visit web pages infected with malicious code. This sort of “drive-by” attack is particularly insidious, as the user can be browsing legitimate websites and will usually have no clue that they have been compromised.

Exploits used in the wild tend to be well known ones where there is publically available code, such as you might find on various security forums. There are many different exploit kits available and we have seen at least a dozen new kits appear over the last six months alone. This report covers some of the most popular kits today, how they are obtained and used, how they work and how cybercriminals make money from them. You can download a copy of the report here, and further information can be found in the press release.

Tags:    |  

View All Reports

Hitting the nail on the head

By Anonymous  •  September 20th, 2007  •   Reports

When we here at the MCRC are publishing our quarterly trends reports (http://www.finjan.com/Content.aspx?id=827), we are always facing the possibility that what we have been working on and predicting that would become the next issue with web security, isn’t really going to happen.

Fortunately, we keep getting great feedback from the community since we started the publication, and were able to correctly predict and analyze way in advance every major trend in the field. From dynamic code obfuscation, advertising as an attack vector, affiliation networks for distributing code, crimeware toolkits, evasive techniques in malicious code writing, and the latest crimeware Trojans, and widgets and gadget insecurity.

We were always able to step back and see how what we have been analyzing in the last couple of months is becoming the new pet-peeve of the web security community and its surrounding media coverage. So once again, thank you Symantec, IBM and everyone else who have acknowledged our latest research, and we’ll be looking forward to the next quarter…

Posted by Iftach Amit

Tags:  

View All Reports

Post BlackHat, pre DefCon

By Anonymous  •  August 3rd, 2007  •   Reports

So it’s been a really hectic couple of days here in Vegas. We are here (myself and 2 members of MCRC – Aviv & Amir), running between presentations, and handling booth/media traffic.

The really interesting trend here is the amount of research that touched web security (in the sense that we at Finjan are focused on). From Kaminsky who talked about the browser being the attack vector to get to the core of the intranet, through the research from SPI (kudos Billy), CaffeineMonkey from the guys at SecureWorks, and so on and so forth (sorry if I left out anyone – I’m still working on 3 differemt time zones and keeping up with the “schedule” here…).

This means so much for us and really gives us a huge boost in terms of putting more research effort and working with our colleagues from other vendors.

In this optimistic tone, we are now facing DefCon – be sure to catch our presentation on Sunday – this stuff is really hot…

IA

Posted by Iftach Amit

Tags:    |  

View All MalwareView All Reports

MCRC Q2 Trend Report

By Anonymous  •  June 6th, 2007  •   Malware Reports

In the tradition of our previous trend reports, MCRC are proud to announce the Q2 Trend Report. This report is dynamite! We are covering advanced techniques used by attackers to hide their code (thought that code-obfuscation was a problem – check out the new methods used to run under the radar these days).

More coverage of the money trail behind web security, with the analysis of the “affiliation” sites used to spread around highly malicious code for money…

And a quick follow-up to our Q1 report covering how advertisements became something you should take with a grain of salt in these days.

Download the new report at http://www.finjan.com/Content.aspx?id=827 – Have fun!

Posted by Iftach Amit

Tags:    |  

View All CybercrimeView All MalwareView All Reports

Google’s “Ghost in a Browser”, WebSense, and more…

By Anonymous  •  May 17th, 2007  •   Cybercrime Malware Reports

First things first – big Kudos to Google for their research paper. We at MCRC have found it to be very reassuring for us – now we know we are not the only nuts out there running around in the security arena and wondering how come nobody sees the imminent threats described in the paper.

I’ve recently ran across a blog post on the websense site (http://www.websense.com/securitylabs/blog/blog.php?BlogID=125) which related to the same research paper, and mentioned that the “bad” news is that it does not cover a lot of other attacks out there.

Right, but to completely correct… When you look at the web security field, most of the other attacks mentioned by our colleagues at WebSense, are still web attacks. Having email/IM lure you to click on a link is a web attack, hacking a legitimate site to have malicious code linked/injected into it is a web attack, typos in domain names are web attacks, etc…

My main point is – does not matter where do you get to the malicious code, it’s still malicious code. And if your security solution can handle it, you are protected. End of story.

We have been seeing a lot of various new trends during the past 3 month at MCRC while researching and analyzing attacks, and the common ground for all of them was still the same, no matter where they came from. sponsored links, hacked sites, phishing emails, IM lures, as long as the true attack vector involves the web channel – it’s a web threat and is definitely covered in the Google paper.

Look for our upcoming Q2 trend report where we’ll cover a LOT of interesting trends as I mentioned above… Really cool stuff…

Posted by Iftach Amit

Tags:    |  

View All Reports

Finjan MCRC Blog opening

By Anonymous  •  February 22nd, 2007  •   Reports

Finally, an MCRC blog where you can read what our MCRC members are working on, new developments in web security and general blurbs.

Posted by Iftach Amit

Tags: